Zuko Vs Hotjar for Form Analytics
We sometimes get asked how Zuko Analytics compares to Insiteful, another piece of software that tracks user behaviour on forms. The fundamental difference between the two platforms is that Insiteful focuses on capturing the details of visitors to partially completed forms. This is then sent to the tracking company for sales and marketing purposes.
Zuko has been built to be GDPR compliant. Under GDPR, capturing people's personal details without their permission is not permitted so Zuko does not, and will never, offer partial lead capture. Instead, we provide anonymised behavioural tracking which allows businesses to understand where users are struggling on their forms so those UX issues can be fixed.
Insiteful does offer limited, basic, form analytics capabilities alongside lead capture. The full comparison is in the table below:
Things Zuko Doesn’t do that Insiteful Does
As outlined above, the key difference is that Insiteful majors on capturing a user's details if they don't successfully complete the tracked form. Zuko prides itself on data privacy, including GDPR compliance so we will never capture end-user personal details without their permission.
Zuko vs Insiteful Pricing for Form Analytics
Insiteful is fairly competitive, starting at $37 per month although the price ramps up quickly if you want all of their capabilities.
Here's what our customers think
"We work in a regulated industry and compliance with privacy regulation like GDPR is hugely important to us. That's why we use Zuko as we can be confident on how they handle end-user data.The privacy regulations we operate under mean that we could never use a partial lead capture tool like Insiteful."
Product Manager, Credit Card Company







